5 ways we need to adapt to climate change — or pay the price


Adaptation can deliver high rates of return, bringing multiple benefits to people and the economy

To avoid the worst consequences of global warming, report after report has stressed the importance of cutting emissions. But with unusually intense weather events wreaking havoc all over the world — from Hurricane Dorian in the Bahamas to heat waves in Europe — new findings suggest that the world needs to devote an equally urgent effort to adapt to the changes that are already on the horizon.  Read the Grist article here 

The 81-page report,  released Tuesday by the Global Commission on Adaptation, argues that big investments in adaptation measures will not only avert environmental catastrophe but also reap significant returns: Researchers found an investment of $1.8 trillion from 2020 to 2030 could generate $7.1 trillion in total net benefits.

The five areas identified as priorities for adaptation are

  • early warning systems,
  • climate-resilient infrastructure,
  • improved dryland agriculture,
  • mangrove protection, and
  • investments in making water resources more resilient.


This represents only a portion of the total investments needed and total benefits available.

Mangrove protection may come as a surprise as a priority action for adaption to those who which to remove them from our harbours.  But mangrove forests prevent more than $80 billion per year in losses from coastal flooding and protect 18 million people. They also contribute just over $40 billion annually to sustain local fisheries. (Incidentally, mangrove forests are also an incredible natural carbon sink.)


2 thoughts on “5 ways we need to adapt to climate change — or pay the price

  1. It takes time to shift the minds and political direction on the Coromandel and the Hauraki District. They would vote for a dead cat rather than start to think for themselves and make an informed choice. Climate change is here and we just have to make the best of a bad situation and plan for the future. Hopefully in 10 years time some of the deniers might wake up by then.


  2. I find the link to the research about the importance of mangroves as a mitigation tool very telling – or is this just another piece of science our mayor and her 7000 plus voters are not ‘convinced’ of?


Comments are closed.